**Version info**: Code for this page was tested in SAS 9.3

Zero-inflated Poisson regression is used to model count data that has an excess of zero counts.
Further, theory suggests that the excess zeros
are generated by a separate process from the count values and that the excess zeros can
be modeled independently. Thus, the **zip** model has two parts, a
Poisson count model and the logit model
for predicting excess zeros. You may want to review these Data Analysis Example pages,
Poisson Regression and
Logit Regression.

**Please Note:** The purpose of this page is to show how to use various data analysis commands.
It does not cover all aspects of the research process which researchers are expected to do. In
particular, it does not cover data cleaning and verification, verification of assumptions, model
diagnostics and potential follow-up analyses.

## Examples of zero-inflated Poisson regression

Example 1. School administrators study the attendance behavior of high school juniors over one semester at two schools. Attendance is measured by number of days of absent and is predicted by gender of the student and standardized test scores in math and language arts. Many students have no absences during the semester.

Example 2. The state wildlife biologists want to model how many fish are being caught by fishermen at a state park. Visitors are asked whether or not they have a camper, how many people were in the group, were there children in the group and how many fish were caught. Some visitors do not fish, but there is no data on whether a person fished or not. Some visitors who did fish did not catch any fish so there are excess zeros in the data because of the people that did not fish.

## Description of the data

Let’s pursue Example 2 from above using the dataset fish.

We have data on 250 groups that went to a park. Each group was questioned
about how many fish they caught (**count**), how many children were in the
group (**child**), how many people were in the group (**persons**), and
whether or not they brought a camper to the park (**camper**).

In addition to predicting the number of fish caught, there is interest in
predicting the existence of excess zeros, i.e., the zeroes that were not simply
a result of bad luck fishing. We will use the variables **child**, **persons**, and **
camper** in our model. Let’s look at the data.

proc means data = fish mean std min max var; var count child persons; run;The MEANS Procedure Variable Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum Variance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- count 3.2960000 11.6350281 0 149.0000000 135.3738795 child 0.6840000 0.8503153 0 3.0000000 0.7230361 persons 2.5280000 1.1127303 1.0000000 4.0000000 1.2381687 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------proc univariate data = fish noprint; histogram count / midpoints = 0 to 50 by 1 vscale = count ; run;proc freq data = fish; tables camper; run;The FREQ Procedure Cumulative Cumulative camper Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 103 41.20 103 41.20 1 147 58.80 250 100.00

## Analysis methods you might consider

Below is a list of some analysis methods you may have encountered. Some of the methods listed are quite reasonable while others have either fallen out of favor or have limitations.

- Zero-inflated Poisson Regression – The focus of this web page.
- Zero-inflated Negative Binomial Regression – Negative binomial regression does better with over dispersed data, i.e., variance much larger than the mean.
- Ordinary Count Models – Poisson or negative binomial models might be more appropriate if there are no excess zeros.
- OLS Regression – You could try to analyze these data using OLS regression. However, count data are highly non-normal and are not well estimated by OLS regression.

## SAS zero-inflated Poisson regression analysis using proc genmod

If you are using SAS version 9.2 or higher, you can run a zero-inflated Poisson model using
**proc** **genmod**.

proc genmod data = fish; class camper; model count = child camper /dist=zip; zeromodel persons /link = logit; run;The GENMOD Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.FISH Written by SAS Distribution Zero Inflated Poisson Link Function Log Dependent Variable count Number of Observations Read 250 Number of Observations Used 250 Class Level Information Class Levels Values camper 2 0 1 Criteria For Assessing Goodness Of Fit Criterion DF Value Value/DF Deviance 2063.2168 Scaled Deviance 2063.2168 Pearson Chi-Square 245 1543.4597 6.2998 Scaled Pearson X2 245 1543.4597 6.2998 Log Likelihood 774.8999 Full Log Likelihood -1031.6084 AIC (smaller is better) 2073.2168 AICC (smaller is better) 2073.4627 BIC (smaller is better) 2090.8241 Algorithm converged. Analysis Of Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimates Standard Wald 95% Confidence Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Limits Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Intercept 1 2.4319 0.0413 2.3510 2.5128 3472.23 ChiSq Intercept 1 1.2974 0.3739 0.5647 2.0302 12.04 0.0005 persons 1 -0.5643 0.1630 -0.8838 -0.2449 11.99 0.0005

The output begins with a summary of the model and the data. This is followed by a list of goodness of fit statistics.

The next block of output includes parameter estimates from the count portion of the model. It also includes the standard errors, Wald 95% confidence intervals, Wald Chi-square statistics, and p-values for the parameter estimates.

The last block of output corresponds to the zero-inflation portion of the model. This is a logistic model predicting the zeroes. The output includes parameter estimates for the inflation model predictors and their standard errors, Wald 95% confidence intervals, Wald Chi-square statistics, and p-values.

All of the predictors in both the count and inflation portions of the model are statistically significant. This model fits the data significantly better than the null model, i.e., the intercept-only model. To show that this is the case, we can run the null model (a model without any predictors) and compare the null model with the current model using chi-squared test on the difference of log likelihoods.

proc genmod data = fish; model count = /dist=zip; zeromodel / link = logit ; run;The GENMOD Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.FISH Written by SAS Distribution Zero Inflated Poisson Link Function Log Dependent Variable count Number of Observations Read 250 Number of Observations Used 250 Criteria For Assessing Goodness Of Fit Criterion DF Value Value/DF Deviance 2254.0459 Scaled Deviance 2254.0459 Pearson Chi-Square 248 1918.7890 7.7371 Scaled Pearson X2 248 1918.7890 7.7371 Log Likelihood 679.4854 Full Log Likelihood -1127.0229 AIC (smaller is better) 2258.0459 AICC (smaller is better) 2258.0945 BIC (smaller is better) 2265.0888 Algorithm converged. Analysis Of Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimates Standard Wald 95% Confidence Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Limits Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Intercept 1 2.0316 0.0349 1.9631 2.1000 3388.16 ChiSq Intercept 1 0.2728 0.1277 0.0225 0.5232 4.56 0.0327

The log likelihoods for the full model and null mode are -1031.6084 and -1127.0229, respectively. The chi-squared value is 2*( -1031.6084 – -1127.0229) = 190.829. Since we have three predictor variables in the full model, the degrees of freedom for the chi-squared test is 3. This yields a p-value <.0001. Thus, our overall model is statistically significant.

We can use the** estimate**
statement to help understand our model. We will
compute the expected counts for the categorical variable **camper** while holding the
continuous variable **child** at its mean value using the **atmeans** option,
as well as calculate the predicted probability that an observation came from the
zero-generating process. In the estimate statement, we provide values at
which to evaluate each coefficient for both the Poisson model and the
zero-inflation model. The sets of coefficients of the two models are
separated by the @ZERO keyword.

proc genmod data = fish; class camper; model count = child camper /dist=zip; zeromodel persons /link = logit ; estimate "camper = 0" intercept 1 child .684 camper 1 0 @ZERO intercept 1 persons 2.528; estimate "camper = 1" intercept 1 child .684 camper 0 1 @ZERO intercept 1 persons 2.528; run;Contrast Estimate Results Mean Mean L'Beta Standard Label Estimate Confidence Limits Estimate Error Alpha camper = 0 2.4220 1.9724 2.9741 0.8846 0.1048 0.05 camper = 0 (Zero Inflation) 0.4677 0.3838 0.5536 -0.1292 0.1756 0.05 camper = 1 5.5768 4.8823 6.3701 1.7186 0.0679 0.05 camper = 1 (Zero Inflation) 0.4677 0.3838 0.5536 -0.1292 0.1756 0.05 Contrast Estimate Results L'Beta Chi- Label Confidence Limits Square Pr > ChiSq camper = 0 0.6792 1.0899 71.28 <.0001 camper = 0 (Zero Inflation) -0.4735 0.2150 0.54 0.4619 camper = 1 1.5856 1.8516 641.42 <.0001 camper = 1 (Zero Inflation) -0.4735 0.2150 0.54 0.4619

In the Mean Estimate column, we find predicted counts of **fish** from the
Poisson model, ignoring the zero-inflation model, for both **camper** = 0 and
**camper** = 1, as well as the predicted probability of belonging to the
zero-generating process from the zero-inflation model. The zero-inflation
model does not include **camper** as a predictor, so the probability of zero
for both zero-inflation models is the same. To get the expected counts of
**fish** from the mixture of the two models, simply multiply the expected
counts from the Poisson model by the probability of getting a non-zero from the
zero-inflation model (1 – p(zero)). Thus, the expected counts of fish for
**camper** = 0 and **camper** = 1 including zero-inflation are
2.422*(1-0.4677) = 1.289 and 5.5768*(1-0.4677) = 2.968, respectively.

## SAS zero-inflated Poisson analysis using proc countreg

**Proc countreg** is another option for running a zero-inflated Poisson
regression in SAS (again, version 9.2 or higher). This procedure allows
for a few more options
specific to count outcomes than **proc genmod**. The **proc countreg**
code for the original model run on this page appears below. We indicate **
method = qn** to specify the quasi-Newton optimization process that matches
the **proc genmod** results.

proc countreg data = fish method = qn; class camper; model count = child camper / dist= zip; zeromodel count ~ persons; run;The COUNTREG Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values camper 2 0 1 Model Fit Summary Dependent Variable count Number of Observations 250 Data Set MYLIB.FISH Model ZIP ZI Link Function Logistic Log Likelihood -1032 Maximum Absolute Gradient 3.69075E-7 Number of Iterations 13 Optimization Method Quasi-Newton AIC 2075 SBC 2096 Algorithm converged. Parameter Estimates Standard Approx Parameter DF Estimate Error t Value Pr > |t| Intercept 1 2.431911 0.041271 58.93 <.0001 child 1 -1.042838 0.099988 -10.43 <.0001 camper 0 1 -0.834022 0.093627 -8.91 <.0001 camper 1 0 0 . . . Inf_Intercept 1 1.297439 0.373850 3.47 0.0005 Inf_persons 1 -0.564347 0.162962 -3.46 0.0005

## SAS Zero-inflated Poisson analysis using proc nlmixed

For those using a version of SAS prior to 9.2, a zero-inflated negative binomial model is doable, though significantly more difficult. Please see this code fragment: Zero-inflated Poisson and Negative Binomial Using Proc Nlmixed.

## Things to consider

- Since
**zip**has both a count model and a logit model, each of the two models should have good predictors. The two models do not necessarily need to use the same predictors. - Problems of perfect prediction, separation or partial separation can occur in the logistic part of the zero-inflated model.
- Count data often use exposure variables to indicate the number of times the event
could have happened. You can incorporate exposure into your model by using the
**exposure()**option. - It is not recommended that zero-inflated poisson models be applied to small samples. What constitutes a small sample does not seem to be clearly defined in the literature.
- Pseudo-R-squared values differ from OLS R-squareds, please see FAQ: What are pseudo R-squareds? for a discussion on this issue.
- In times past, the Vuong test had been used to test whether a zero-inflated Poisson model or a Poisson model (without the zero-inflation) was a better fit for the data. However, this test is no longer considered valid. Please see The Misuse of The Vuong Test For Non-Nested Models to Test for Zero-Inflation by Paul Wilson for further information.

## See also

- Annotated output for the poisson command
- SAS Online Manual

## References

- Cameron, A. Colin and Trivedi, P.K. (2009) Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
- Long, J. Scott (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.