Version info: Code for this page was tested in Stata 12.
Interval regression is used to model outcomes that have interval censoring.
In other words, you know the ordered category into which each observation falls,
but you do not know the exact value of the observation. Interval
regression is a generalization of censored regression.
Please note: The purpose of this page is to show how to use various data
analysis commands. It does not cover all aspects of the research process which
researchers are expected to do. In particular, it does not cover data
cleaning and checking, verification of assumptions, model diagnostics or
potential follow-up analyses.
Examples of interval regression
Example 1. We wish to model annual income using years of education and marital status. However,
we do not have access to the precise values for income. Rather, we only have data on the income ranges:
<$15,000, $15,000-$25,000, $25,000-$50,000, $50,000-$75,000, $75,000-$100,000, and >$100,000. Note
that the extreme values of the categories on either end of the range are either left-censored
or right-censored. The other categories are interval censored, that is, each interval is both
left- and right-censored. Analyses of this type require a generalization of censored regression
known as interval regression.
Example 2. We wish to predict GPA from teacher ratings of effort and from reading and writing test
scores. The measure of GPA is a self-report response to the following item:
Select the category that best represents your overall GPA. less than 2.0 2.0 to 2.5 2.5 to 3.0 3.0 to 3.4 3.4 to 3.8 3.8 to 3.9 4.0 or greater
Again, we have a situation with both interval censoring and left- and right-censoring. We do not know the exact value of GPA for each student; we only know the interval in which their
GPA falls.
Example 3. We wish to predict GPA from teacher ratings of effort, writing
test scores and the type of program in which the student was enrolled
(vocational, general or academic). The measure of GPA is a self-report response to the following item:
Select the category that best represents your overall GPA. 0.0 to 2.0 2.0 to 2.5 2.5 to 3.0 3.0 to 3.4 3.4 to 3.8 3.8 to 4.0
This is a slight variation of Example 2. In this example, there is only interval censoring.
Description of the data
Let’s pursue Example 3 from above.
We have a hypothetical data file, intreg_data.dta with 30 observations. The GPA score is represented by two values, the lower interval score (lgpa) and the upper
interval score (ugpa). The writing test scores, the teacher rating
and the type of program (a nominal variable which has three levels) are write, rating and type, respectively.
Let’s look at the data. It is always a good idea to start with
descriptive statistics.
use https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stat/stata/dae/intreg_data, clear
list lgpa ugpa, clean
lgpa ugpa
1. 2.5 3
2. 3.4 3.8
3. 2.5 3
4. 0 2
5. 3 3.4
6. 3.4 3.8
7. 3.8 4
8. 2 2.5
9. 3 3.4
10. 3.4 3.8
11. 2 2.5
12. 2 2.5
13. 2 2.5
14. 2.5 3
15. 2.5 3
16. 2.5 3
17. 3.4 3.8
18. 2.5 3
19. 2 2.5
20. 3 3.4
21. 3.4 3.8
22. 3.8 4
23. 2 2.5
24. 3 3.4
25. 3.4 3.8
26. 2 2.5
27. 2 2.5
28. 2 2.5
29. 2.5 3
30. 2.5 3
Note that there are two GPA responses for each observation, lgpa for the lower end of the
interval and ugpa for the upper end.
summarize lgpa ugpa write rating
Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------
lgpa | 30 2.6 .7754865 0 3.8
ugpa | 30 3.096667 .5708332 2 4
write | 30 113.8333 49.94278 50 205
rating | 30 57.53333 8.303441 48 72
tabstat lgpa ugpa, by(type) stats(n mean sd)
Summary statistics: N, mean, sd
by categories of: type
type | lgpa ugpa
-----------+--------------------
vocational | 8 8
| 1.75 2.4375
| .7071068 .1767767
-----------+--------------------
general | 10 10
| 2.78 3.24
| .3852849 .3373096
-----------+--------------------
academic | 12 12
| 3.016667 3.416667
| .6336522 .5474458
-----------+--------------------
Total | 30 30
| 2.6 3.096667
| .7754865 .5708332
--------------------------------
Graphing these data can be rather tricky. Just to get an idea of what the distribution of
GPA is, we will do separate histograms for lgpa and ugpa. We
will also correlate the variables in the dataset.
histogram ugpa, normal xlabel(0(1)4) name(hugpa) histogram lgpa, normal xlabel(0(1)4) name(hlgpa) graph combine hlgpa hugpa, ycommon xsize(7)
correlate lgpa ugpa write rating
(obs=30)
| lgpa ugpa write rating
-------------+------------------------------------
lgpa | 1.0000
ugpa | 0.9488 1.0000
write | 0.6206 0.6572 1.0000
rating | 0.5355 0.5904 0.4763 1.0000
Analysis methods you might consider
Below is a list of some analysis methods you may have
encountered. Some of the methods listed are quite reasonable, while others have
either fallen out of favor or have limitations.
- Interval regression – This method is appropriate when you know into what
interval each observation of the outcome variable falls, but you do not know
the exact value of the observation. - Ordered probit – It is possible to conceptualize this model
as an ordered probit regression with six ordered categories: 0 (0.0-2.0),
1 (2.0-2.5), 2 (2.5-3.0), 3 (3.0-3.4), 4 (3.4-3.8), and 5 (3.8-4.0). - Ordinal logistic regression – The results would
be very similar in terms of which predictors are significant; however, the predicted
values would be in terms of probabilities of membership in each of the categories. It would
be necessary that the data meet the proportional odds assumption which, in fact, these
data do not meet when converted into ordinal categories. - OLS regression – You could analyze these data using OLS regression on the
midpoints of the intervals. However, that analysis would not reflect our uncertainty
concerning the nature of the exact values within each interval, nor would it deal adequately
with the left- and right-censoring issues in the tails.
Interval regression
We will use the intreg command to run the interval regression
analysis. The intreg command requires two outcome variables, the
lower limit of the interval and the upper limit of the interval. The i. before
type indicates that it is a factor
variable (i.e., categorical variable), and that it should be included in the
model as a series of indicator variables. Note that this syntax was introduced
in Stata 11.
intreg lgpa ugpa write rating i.type
Fitting constant-only model:
Iteration 0: log likelihood = -52.129849
Iteration 1: log likelihood = -51.74803
Iteration 2: log likelihood = -51.747288
Iteration 3: log likelihood = -51.747288
Fitting full model:
Iteration 0: log likelihood = -35.224403
Iteration 1: log likelihood = -33.142851
Iteration 2: log likelihood = -33.128906
Iteration 3: log likelihood = -33.128905
Interval regression Number of obs = 30
LR chi2(4) = 37.24
Log likelihood = -33.128905 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
write | .0052847 .0016921 3.12 0.002 .0019683 .0086012
rating | .0133143 .0091197 1.46 0.144 -.0045601 .0311886
|
type |
2 | .374853 .19275 1.94 0.052 -.00293 .7526359
3 | .7097467 .1668399 4.25 0.000 .3827466 1.036747
|
_cons | 1.103863 .4452887 2.48 0.013 .2311137 1.976613
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
/lnsigma | -1.237263 .1596419 -7.75 0.000 -1.550155 -.9243703
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma | .2901775 .0463245 .2122151 .3967812
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Observation summary: 0 left-censored observations
0 uncensored observations
0 right-censored observations
30 interval observations
constant only model, and then the full model (the model with predictor
variables).
observations used in the analysis (30) is given, along with a likelihood-ratio chi-square. The
likelihood-ratio chi-square tests the difference between the full model (with predictors)
and the constant only model. Below that is the p-value for the chi-square with
four
degrees of freedom. This model, as a whole, is statistically significant.
The log-likelihood for the full model is also given. This value can be
used to compare models.
their standard errors, z-values, p-values and 95% confidence intervals.
The coefficients for write and 3.type are statistically
significant; the coefficient for rating and 2.type are not (at
the .05 level of significance).
variable write is statistically significant. A unit
increase in writing score leads to a .005 increase in predicted GPA.
One of the indicator variables for type is also statistically
significant. Compared to level 1 of type, the
predicted achievement for level 3 of type increases by about .71. To determine if
type itself
is statistically significant, we can use the constrast command to obtain the
two degree-of-freedom test of this variable. This is shown below.
in OLS regression. The value of 0.29 can be compared to the standard deviations for
lgpa and ugpa of 0.78 and 0.57, respectively. This shows a substantial reduction. The output also contains an estimate of the standard
error of sigma, as well as a 95% confidence interval. Stata does not compute sigma directly
but actually computes the log of sigma (/lnsigma in the output).
no observations are left- or right-censored, no observations are uncensored,
and all 30 observations are interval censored.
contrast type
Contrasts of marginal linear predictions
Margins : asbalanced
------------------------------------------------
| df chi2 P>chi2
-------------+----------------------------------
model |
type | 2 18.71 0.0001
------------------------------------------------
The two degree-of-freedom chi-square test indicates that type is a
statistically significant predictor of lgpa and ugpa.
We can use the margins
command to obtain the expected cell means. Note that these are different
from the means we obtained with the tabstat command above, because they
are adjusted for write and rating also.
margins type
Predictive margins Number of obs = 30
Model VCE : OIM
Expression : Linear prediction, predict()
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Delta-method
| Margin Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
type |
1 | 2.471456 .13236 18.67 0.000 2.212035 2.730877
2 | 2.846309 .118957 23.93 0.000 2.613157 3.07946
3 | 3.181203 .0969802 32.80 0.000 2.991125 3.37128
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The expected mean GPA for students in program type 1 (vocational) is 2.47; the
expected mean GPA for students in program type 3 (academic) is 3.18.
If you would like to
compare interval regression models, you can issue the estat ic command to get the log
likelihood, AIC and BIC values.
estat ic
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model | Obs ll(null) ll(model) df AIC BIC
-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
. | 30 -51.74729 -33.12891 6 78.25781 86.66499
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: N=Obs used in calculating BIC; see [R] BIC note
The intreg command does not compute an R2 or pseudo-R2. You can compute an approximate measure of fit by calculating the R2 between the
predicted and observed values.
predict p
correlate lgpa ugpa p
(obs=30)
| lgpa ugpa p
-------------+---------------------------
lgpa | 1.0000
ugpa | 0.9488 1.0000
p | 0.7494 0.8430 1.0000
display .7494^2
.56160036
display .8430^2
.710649
The calculated values of approximately .56 and .71 are probably close to what you would find in an OLS
regression if you had actual GPA scores. You can also make use of the Long and Freese utility command fitstat (search spostado)
(see How can I use
the search command to search for programs and get additional help? for more
information about using search),
which provides a number of pseudo-R2s in addition to other measures of fit. The
Cox-Snell pseudo-R2, in which the ratio of the likelihoods reflects
the improvement of the full model over the intercept-only model,
is close to our approximate estimates above.
fitstat
Measures of Fit for intreg of lgpa ugpa
Log-Lik Intercept Only: -51.747 Log-Lik Full Model: -33.129
D(23): 66.258 LR(4): 37.237
Prob > LR: 0.000
McFadden's R2: 0.360 McFadden's Adj R2: 0.225
ML (Cox-Snell) R2: 0.711 Cragg-Uhler(Nagelkerke) R2: 0.734
McKelvey & Zavoina's R2: 0.760
Variance of y*: 0.351 Variance of error: 0.084
AIC: 2.675 AIC*n: 80.258
BIC: -11.970 BIC': -23.632
BIC used by Stata: 86.665 AIC used by Stata: 78.258
Things to consider
See also
- Stata online manual
- Related Stata commands
- Annotated output for the intreg
command
References
- Long, J. S. and Freese, J. (2006).
Regression
Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables Using Stata,
Second Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press. - Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. - Stewart, M. B. (1983). On least squares estimation when the dependent variable is grouped.
Review of Economic Studies 50: 737-753. - Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables.
Econometrica 26: 24-36.